The match was a real humdinger and went down
till the last ball – whether you would celebrate or mourn it, depends on which
side you were with. This is not the
first time in history but has occurred 24 times before in One dayers.
In my post after Sachin’s century, I had felt
that nothing is a safe score now a days – 676 runs – 18 wickets – a great tie –
everyone who saw the match will remember every bit of bit. Added will be the poor bowling performance
displayed by the Indians in not being able to defend 338. Indian ground
fielding was very poor – slow movers, bad throwing arms and not able to prevent
singles even when the shot was hit direct to them. It should be a grim alarm for no team no
ineptitude in bowling and butter in fielding have won a WC before.
After that fine century of Sachin, things were
never easy – Pieterson and Strauss plundered at will and then Bell was stroking very freely. England were never away from the
target. At end of over 42 – they were
280 for 2 with 59 requiring of 48 balls.
With 8 wickets in hand, an asking rate of 7.37 that too for 8 overs was
very much English way.
Over no. 43 was different – England took the batting
powerplay. The fourth ball saw a tired
and cramp suffering Bell
mistiming a hit and Kohli taking an easy catch. The next ball the hero Strauss
was trapped in front by a Khan elivery
making 158 off 145 balls – a quality innings.
For the only moment when an Indian victory
seemed most probable was after the end of 48 overs – England were 310/7 – tail enders
Bresnan and Swann at the crease and 29 required off 12 balls. It was Piyush Chawla – a dot ball and then
second was swept by Swann for a huge six.
The fifth ball Bresnan hoisted him over midwicket for another six. 15 conceded and in the last they required 14
off 6 with 2 wickets in hand.
Ajmal Shahzad has so far scored 38 runs at an
average of 7.60. The final over read thus : 2, 1 (now 11 off
4) - 3rd was hit down straight for a
SIX, 4th a bye, 5th Swann gets an inside edge and runs two. Last ball two required – Swann hit straight
to mid off and ran one and the result was there for everybody.
Indians bowled poorly, fielded worser and
Munaf did not even complete a run when he was on as a batsman. It was not without controversies – everyone
saw the match knew that Bell
was out but he survived thanks to technology.
25th over Yuvi struck Bell who had pitched his leg well forward for
a paddle – Billy Bowden turned down the appeal.
Dhoni went in for review. The TV
replays showed that it was not a no ball, was in line of the stumps and would
have struck the middle of the stumps. Crowd roared and Bell started trudging back. He was only 17. When everyone believed out, the third umpire
after watching things on a slow motion ruled Bell not out.
Cricinfo writes of rule 2.5m
More than all that was revealed there is the
criteria of 2.5 meters assuming that it is from that point onward the precision
of ball tracking technology begins to reduce.
So too far down the pitch would mean not out even if it otherwise looks
certain. Strange and curious are the
ways of rule makers. Bell went on to make another half century and
spoil Indian’s party.
UDRS was touted to be a
technology but if Hawkeye is not to be believed at some measure, why have it at
all ? there have been times earlier,
when batsmen have been given out even when they had danced down to play the
delivery, Sachin was once given LBW when he ducked and had it on his
shoulder. ICC playing conditions under
Process of Consultation No. 3.3 (i). It states that if a 'not out' decision is
being reviewed and the distance from impact to the stumps is greater than 2.5m
then the third umpire passes this information to the on-field official along
with: the distance from the wickets of the point of impact with the batsman,
the approximate distance from the point of pitching to the point of impact, and
whether the ball is predicted to the hit the stumps the on-field umpire shall have regard to the
normal cricketing principles concerning the level of certainty in making his
decision as to whether to change his decision.
Good use of technology…………………………………..
Of the 24 times it has occurred in ODI
history, India has been involved four
times – Once against WI at Perth in Dec 91, twice against Zimbabwe – one at
Indore in Nov 93 and at Paarl in Jan 97 and once now.
Regards – S. Sampathkumar