Today
at Perth India
play Sri Lanka in the CBS
Tri Series – Perth
may not be the ideal One day venue with its support for pacers. Its in fact a re-match of the 2011 WC Finals
and MS Dhoni and Virender Sehwag are set to play their first ODI together since
the World Cup final. But after 10 months
of the Indian hour of glory after Wankhede finals, much has changed – the fortunes
have nose-dived and the teams have been battered outside their dominion.
At
a time when money flowed in IPL auction, Lankans are in disarray as the players
are not even paid by their bankrupt board.
The battered and bruised Lankans have had other shocks as well – Geoff Marsh
has been rudely taken off, Dilshan found the going too tough and relinquished
captaincy ! so Mahela Jayawardene is
back at the helm. India has been playing Lanka rather
frequently with 34 of their 129 clashes
happening between 2008 and 2010.
The
dasher Virender Sehwag who was dropped against Australia in the inaugural game is
most like to play. Indians who lost time
won the CB series is now struggling at the start of the series itself is not a
welcome sign. In the last match, in Australia ,
Dhoni played with 2 pacers – Vinay Kumar and Praveen and that speaks the
volumes of the bench strength though
there is Irfan Pathan, Umesh Yadav and Zaheer.
Ravindra Jadeja who was sold for
so many crores in the IPL 5 and who won the MoM in T20 primarily for his
fielding, leaked 41 runs in 16 balls and is most likely to be dropped.
So
a clash of neighbours in a far away Perth . Lankans would be led by Mahela of a pace
centered attack of Angelo Mathews, Thisara Perara, Kulasekara, Malinga and
possibly Welegadara trying to exploit the green pitch on a hot day. India
have a career 68-50 advantage, but One dayers are always games where the team
that plays better on that day wins, rather than the form or the status of the
players !! Sachin besides that elusive
100th ton is 18 away from 3000 runs against Lanka having made more
than 3000 against Australia ,
a feat which no one else has achieved. There
is talk of India
mulling rotation of openers - Virender
Sehwag, Gautam Gambhir and Tendulkar which would be decent explanation of
Sehwag being left out of ODI at MCG. Despite
the dismal performance the team did not change their batting line-up in the 4
test series.
There
are reports that the Sri Lanka Cricket Board postponed the inaugural T 20 bash amid looming
financial crunch and the withdrawal of BCCI from the league. Without Indian support, SLC cannot organize
the tournament as Sri Lanka Cricket is
reported to have accumulated $69 million
in debt after the World Cup. India
last month barred its players from taking part in the Sri Lanka Premier League,
saying the tournament was being organized by a private company. In such a depressing scenario, Sri Lanka ’s national cricket board
was elected uncontested recently amid
allegations that political pressure had forced favourites to withdraw from the
first election in seven years. Businessman
Upali Dharmadasa became president of Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) unopposed as
front-runner Thilanga Sumathipala withdrew at the last minute. The sports ministry, which conducted the
election among cricket clubs affiliated to Sri Lanka Cricket, dismissed
allegations of irregularities.
Sri
Lanka Cricket is facing a severe financial crisis over the cost of co-hosting
the 2011 World Cup. SLC has not been
able to pay salaries to its staff for October and to around 100 contracted Sri
Lankan cricketers since the island nation co-hosted the World Cup with India and Bangladesh in April earlier this
year due to the debt that the country's Board is facing. Some 263 employees of the Board and 94
contracted cricketers' payments remain outstanding to be settled, the officials
confirmed. It is stated that SLC needs over 30 million rupees monthly to
meet its contractual payment obligations and staff wages. The number of staff has gone up from 12 in
1996 when Sri Lanka
won the World Cup to over 260 now and the management is often criticised for
its extravagance.
Elsewhere,
after the whitewash handed to England
there was fresh controversy after the interview of the Man of the Series – the spinner
Saeed Ajmal. There are reports that in the
interview with the BBC, Ajmal volunteered the belief that the ICC had allowed
him 23.5 degrees to compensate for an accident in which he injured his arm. The
ICC, however, were quick to reject the suggestion.
Cricinfo
quotes Ajmal as saying "Someone is telling me my action is bad because the
ICC allowed me as a bowler 23.5 degrees, because my arm is not good. A few
years ago I had an accident. Otherwise, no problem, the action was cleared by
ICC." An ICC spokeman denied that
was the case. "There is no dispensation for anyone," he said.
"It is worth remembering that his first language is not English and this
may have been a slip of the tongue.". David
Richardson, the ICC's general manager of cricket, confirmed that Ajmal's arm is
not naturally straight and that Ajmal's action does not fall outside the
15-degree tolerance limit. "There
is a big difference between the 'elbow carry angle' (elbow abduction) and the
degree of elbow extension," he said. "There is nothing preventing a
bowler bowling with a bent arm, provided he does not straighten it beyond the
permitted degrees of tolerance." In
an interview on the ICC website, Richardson
added: "In Saeed Ajmal's case he has a 15-degree angle of elbow
abduction." The PCB issued a
statement attempting to clarify the situation although their claim that Ajmal's
elbow has a natural angle of 23 degrees didn't match Richardson 's explanation that it was 15
degrees, which also happens to be the ICC's tolerance limit.
Can
you decipher that ? - a tough rule
understood by none and interpreted by everybody – Muralitharan was subjected to
humiliation and torture, undergoing bio-mechanics test and more with multiple
leads attached to his body and yet called a sinner by some Boards, taunted
down-under, now Ajmal the leading wicket taker and the man who took 24 wickets
in the present series at an average of 14.7 is under cloud. The Britons led by Bob Willis had already
raised concerns on his action.
With
regards – S. Sampathkumar .
No comments:
Post a Comment