One
of the primary requirement for enforcing discipline is tough laws and stringent
implementation. The news below is somewhat heartening as this could go a long
way in reducing accidents, especially those arising out of human negligence.
Indian
Penal Code Sec 302 is the section for ‘punishment for murder’ and Sec 304A is
causing death by negligence – by any rash or negligent act which provides
punishment with imprisonment extendable to a term beyond 2 years - automobile accidents are generally treated
under this Section.
Driver
on wheel being intoxicated is a great menace and many accidents are caused by
inebriated drivers under the influence of alcohol not able to control the
vehicle in the desired manner. Drunken
driving is a menace as also the driver talking on mobile phone. These are not be seen as simply acts of
rashness but more of negligence causing grievous injury to death to the other
road users by callous acts.
Recently,
Justice M.M. Sundresh of the Madras High Court set the tone by asking the trial
court Judges to look into the facts and circumstances of each cases for
deciding appropriate punishment especially in respect of deaths caused due to
drunken driving. The Judge was also
quoted as directing Investigating agencies to register a case under Section
304(ii) of IPC if a person, driving under the influence of alcohol, causes
death in a road accident. The section deals with punishment for culpable
homicide and provides for a maximum sentence of 10 years.
These
remarks were made while passing orders on a bail plea filed by a person who had on
Jan 2012, rammed his car into two bikes and an auto coming from the opposite
after crossing the yellow line. He then crashed into a pavement, leading to the
death of one person. He was initially
booked under section 304(A) of IPC, which deals with causing death by
negligence. After tests revealed that Ramesh was drunk at the time of
theaccident, the charges were altered to those under Section 304(ii). He was
arrested on January 30 and remanded in judicial custody the same day.
The
Judge while noting that cases of drunken driving had been dealt leniently by
Magistrate Courts imposing fines, felt that such an approach is contrary to law
and public interest. Citing a recent
Supreme Court order, which called for stringent punishment under Section
304(ii) for drunk driving, the judge rejected the argument of the petitioner’s
counsel that this provision would not be attracted in the case. The judge said
the reasoning adopted by the SC “clinches the entire issue”.
Now
more appears to be happening. Times of
India reports that Union Cabinet today (1st Mar 2012) approved the
proposed changes in the Motor Vehicle Act,
paving way for passing the legislation in Parliament to increase penalty
on traffic rule violators across the country.
The new bill which will be introduced in the Rajya Sabha duing the
Budget session has provision to slap Rs 500 fine for not wearing seat belt and
helmet or for jumping a red light for the first time. The bill introduces fines
for using mobile phone while driving.
The
fines will multiply in case the same offender violates the traffic rules
subsequently. As per the new provision
drink driving would be dealt with high penality and even jail term. Drink
driving will be graded according to alcohol levels in the blood with a
punishment that can go up to a two-year jail term and Rs 5,000 fine or both.
Repeat
traffic offences will fetch stiff fines with jumping red lights or not using
seat belts and helmets attracting fine between Rs 500 to Rs 1,500. The first
offence of using cellphone will mean Rs 500 fine and subsequent infringements
can set the offender back by Rs 5,000 in penalties. To discourage the use of
cellphones, which have emerged as a key reason for road accidents all over the
world, the new bill has proposed stiff fines.
Working
on the proposition that higher fines work as a deterrent and can induce greater
respect for the law, the Cabinet is expected to clear a slew of amendments in
the Motor Vehicle Bill on Thursday. The increase in some categories are up to
eight-10 folds over existing fines. The changes intend to make the vehicle
owner responsible in case a minor is caught at the wheel. The proposals to hike fines aim to target the
major causes of accidents and fatalities on India 's roads - drink driving,
speeding, non-wearing of seatbelts and helmet and use of cellphone. To penalize
habitual offenders, the bill incorporates higher fines and longer jail terms
for repeat offences.
The
disrespect for speed limits could attract Rs 1,000 fine for the first offence.
Subsequently, the penalty could be as high as Rs 5,000.
Such
changes in the Rules augur for a Country where drivers callously keep talking
on mobile and drive in inebriated condition
With
regards – S. Sampathkumar .
Both tipes of drivers are very dangerous but we can't compare a drunk driver with the one that's texting or talking at the phone....
ReplyDeleteIt's true that bad things can happen in both cases but at least a driver that is just talking at his phone can react if the situation requires while a drunk driver won't be able to avoid a crash because his ability to take fast actions is reduced.
What surprised me is that the number of impaired driving Toronto cases is close to the one of careless driving...this is sad and I hope someone will do something about this.
Darn! Congratulations to Esoneht (while secretly hoping for a
ReplyDeleteredraw). A minimum of if there is a redraw, all of our odds go
up just a little bit! Earth and Cash recently posted.
.Planning a Green Frugal Wedding Venue
Check out my web blog ... cost of the new ipad