To multitudes of
Indians, no doubt Sachin represent the face of India – the icon of Cricket with
loads of records behind him. Recently, India’s
latest batting sensation Virat Kohli said Sachin Tendulkar deserves country’s
highest civilian award — the Bharat Ratna.
His voice is not alone; earlier Maharashtra Chief Minister Prithviraj
Chavan told the state Assembly that his government would recommend Tendulkar’s
name for the highest civilian award. One need not take Kohli too seriously; he
may be a good batsman, getting so many endorsements despite his failure in IPL
version 5 – he can concentrate more on cricket rather than speak on any
national issues.
Bharat Rathna – meaning
‘Gem of India’ has greater significance
than Sports performance. It is an award
of highest National service including art,
literature and scientific achievements as also in recognition of public service
of the highest order.
On
a different plane, Press Council of India Chairman Justice
Markandey Katju remarked that Cricketers like Sachin Tendulkar should not
be honoured with the Bharat Ratna as the demand to give the award to filmstars
and cricket players spoke of ‘the low cultural level’. He favoured giving award posthumously to some
more greatly regarded persons like Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay, Munshi
Premchand and Tamil poet Subramania Bharathi.
In
India we have the bad practice of elevating people to Godly status
instantaneously and then criticizing them in a short span. Stars of tinseldom get much more recognition
than Scientists and those doing grat work to humanity. With its fan following, cricketers achieve
fame rather too early and mint money through endorsements more than by playing
the game. For a matured cricket fan, the
100th ton coming as it did by combining two different forms of
Cricket meant little – still the Nation celebrated and almost immediately, he
has been nominated as a Member of the Rajya Sabha. Some have even mocked it as a political ploy
by the ruling party to enhance its stature.
Sachin Tendulkar is not alone, nor was the first person to become a
nominated MP. With its original
intent, Article 80 (3) of the
Constitution was best reflected by Jawaharlal Nehru when he said in 1953, “The
nominated MPs do not represent any political party or anything but they
represent the high watermark of literature, art or culture, or whatever it may
be.” The only sportsman to be earlier nominated was wrestler Dara Singh is a
measure of just how historically sports was treated as a ‘lesser’ activity.
Dara Singh too, after all, was more an entertainer than a sportsman. Sachin is young – yes young for the Parliament
and can attend regularly and speak more on National issues. But has to clearly decide his role – whether
to continue playing or represent the Nation at a great representative body. If he opts out of a session for playing a
game of IPL, then it would not be appropriate in the interests of the Nation
though he is still capable of scoring runs in any form of cricket including T20
of IPL. In some circles, it is now
spoken that becoming a nominated Rajya
Sabha member the best post-retirement plan for someone with the iconic status
of a Tendulkar.
Speaking
of Bharat Ratna being conferred after death,
there was no provision when this Award was institutionalized. Mahatma Gandhi was never awarded Bharat
Ratna. Legendary freedom fighter Nethaji Subash Chandra Bose was awarded in
1992 but was later withdrawn to a legal technicality in accepting his death. Tamilnadu’s
MG Ramachandran was conferred Bharat Ratna posthumously and curiously two
foreigners Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan (1987)
and Nelson Mandela (1990) were conferred Bharat Ratna. 11
persons have been awarded this after their death – recognition after their
passing away. Apart from Vinobha Bhave, Jayaprakash Narain and Dr BR Ambedkar,
rest were all connected with political field. Abul Kalam Azad was given this
award posthumously in 1992, though he passed away in 1958.
With regards – S. Sampathkumar.
13th May 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment