It was launched with so much of brouhaha ! ~ when the first
of its brand took off from Tokyo to Hong Kong on its
first commercial flight in October 2011, getting a seat was so difficult that an
aviation enthusiast spent $30,000 in an auction to buy his ticket on the
flight. As of now there are reportedly a
total of 50 with All Nippon Airways topping the list with 17; Air India has 6.
They were neither faster nor bigger than existing jumbo jets;
yet they were hailed as the most revolutionary step in air passenger travel
since Concorde ~ that was not just because it is effectively made of plastic,
making it lighter and more fuel-efficient than other planes. Its major advance
is on the inside, where it offers new levels of passenger comfort. The less
than 250 seater, has obviously bigger windows, wider seats, less of aisles ~
staggering price but good customer comfort, was it was meant to be.
The Carriers were looking to save fuel with
carbon-composite jet; the enthusiasm has perhaps died down but there have been
some worrying incidents in less than a fortnight. Newspaper reports suggest that mechanical
problems aboard Boeing's new Dreamliner 787 airliner seem to be happening far
too often for some. The latest trouble
spot is the potential risk of battery fire; the others in the growing list of
reported troubles aboard the Dreamliner include a fuel leak, an oil leak, two
cracked engines, a damaged cockpit window and a battery problem. In the most
serious incident so far, a battery alarm prompted an emergency landing in Japan Wednesday
of an ANA 787 carrying 129 passengers.
Much has occurred later ~ U.S. and Japanese authorities have
ordered airlines to stop flying their Boeing 787s until they can show they've
fixed a fire risk linked to battery failures aboard the closely watched
Dreamliners. The moves by the U.S.
Federal Aviation Administration and the Japanese government follow an emergency
landing in Japan that
prompted that country's two major airlines to ground their fleets of 787s, and
a similar problem aboard a Dreamliner on the ground in Boston nine days earlier.
There was not much trouble after the first commercial
Dreamliner flight took off in October 2011, flying from Tokyo
to Hong Kong ; the planes flew without major
problems for more than a year. But trouble started from July from whence there
have been troubles reported. In the All
Nippon Airlines (ANA) 787 incident, the aircraft with 129 people aboard made an
emergency landing after a battery alarm; those on board reported a burning
smell in the cabin, and an alarm indicated smoke in a forward electrical
compartment. Hours later, ANA and Japan Airlines announced that they
were grounding their Dreamliners pending an investigation. Later Japanese
government ordered that all 787s be kept out of service until battery safety
could be assured.
Then on Wednesday night, Chile-based LAN Airlines said it was
temporarily grounding its three Boeing 787 aircraft in compliance with the
FAA's recommendation. The Federal
Aviation Administration reportedly issued an emergency order late Wednesday
telling U.S. airlines to stop flying Boeing 787 Dreamliners until they can
prove that batteries on board are safe.
Back home, Air India also flies Dramliners and now
it is reported that AI has grounded its fleet of six Boeing 787 aircraft under
orders from Indian aviation authorities.
Earlier, India ’s
aviation regulator DGCA was categoric that there was no need to ground the
Boeing 787 Dreamliners despite several airlines around the world giving up on
the faulty planes. There reportedly had
been a couple of incidents but were seen as “routine” with airline officials
saying such problems occur with many new aircraft but are corrected by the
manufacturer as time goes by. “Fuel leakage happened on Dreamliners but this is
not uncommon. When the aircraft is being refuelled, sometimes the fuel
overflows.
Apart from the safety concerns, these grounding
could mean more for the loss-laden Air India , which had pinned its hopes
on returning to profitability by making intelligent use of the Dreamliners
instead of fuel guzzling 777s. The Boeing
Company is stated as reassuring that the company is confident that the planes
are safe and is working with authorities to get them flying again.
With regards – S. Sampathkumar
No comments:
Post a Comment