Those who have invested in
secondary market [with little knowledge of finance market] will know that better….
You see bears everywhere. In Insurance,
in most coverages ‘selection of risks’ is not allowed ~ all property will have
to be insured and one cannot insure only those which are prone to losses and
pay premium for those alone – for this will be against the Insurers. However Burglary Insurance is different ~ it
allows selection. Property is insured
under both Fire and Burglary Insurance … when it comes to Burglary coverage
1) the
building / fixed assets portion is excluded from coverage as this will not be
exposed to the peril ‘burglary’
2) in case
the stocks are bulk in nature – total loss i.e., the entire property getting
lost in a burglary is unlikely… in such cases in keeping tune with the
principle ‘PML – probable maximum loss’ – insurance can be arranged on ‘first
loss basis’ – wherein coverage is granted upto a fixed % on stocks – premium
saving.
It is another matter that there have been
losses to property arising out of burglary defying all common logic…. There
could be material which may never be of use to burglar – still they get stolen
– yet cause huge loss to the insured. There have been reported losses where it
would be humanely impossible to lift the material in one-go and yet truck-loads
could get lost. In one known instance, medicine [schedule drugs which can be
bought only with prescription and have to be remain refrigerated always] worth
lakhs of rupees were burgled……….~ this one reported in Business Standard would
take the cake……
Its shares are trading below a Rupee and
naturally nobody would be willing to trade at this stage ~ no transaction for
more than a month – it is the Kolkata based Vikash Metal & Power Ltd promoted by Vimal
Patni….. this company was in news when the scam in the allocation of coal block
hit the headlines.
Reports suggest that the promoters were mired in litigations
involving Income Tax and Excise department. There were reports of the Patnis
raided by the Income Tax too. It was alleged that the proprietors had not
filed their IT returns and the group came under the scanner of the Central
Excise department later. The company had been accused of concealing the stock
of sponge iron at its Bolpur godown in West Bengal. Agency sources said coal
ministry officials ignored its poor credentials including tax litigation still
allocated the coal block, which was sought to be cancelled later.
This is not about the coal scam
but ‘incidence of robbery’ a la Vadivelu losing his well. Business Standard reports that Vikash Metal
& Power says it lost a building and other stuff worth Rs 90 cr to an
"incident of robbery" and auditors endorsed it. Here is the report extract.
It happened in West Bengal’s
Purulia last year. At least, that was what the victim, a listed company, told
its shareholders in its latest annual report. The facts of the case presented
by the company and endorsed by its auditors challenge the accounting notion of
‘immovable property’ and raises questions about the level of oversight by
various regulatory authorities, say market watchers.
On April 12, 2012,
Kolkata-based steel maker Vikash Metal & Power says it was the victim of a
robbery at its plant site in Poradiha village of Purulia district. Among what
was taken away were a factory shed, a building, heavy machinery used to make
steel rods and stock worth crores of rupees. The company informed the stock
exchange a little more than two months later, on June 21, saying a police
complaint and an insurance claim had been filed but without revealing the
extent of loss.
A detailed version came in the
annual report put before the shareholders six months later.For the year ended
June 30, 2012, the company clocked revenue of Rs 476 crore and reported a loss
of Rs 179 crore. Over half or Rs 90.4 crore was ‘exceptional item (loss due to
robbery)’. Note number 25 to the accounts itemised it as plant & machinery
worth Rs 51.3 crore robbed; value of stock lost, Rs 26 crore. And, even factory
shed and buildings stolen, worth about Rs 12 crore. Elsewhere another note in
the annual report said, “As the robbery was on April 12, depreciation on the
item lost was taken till that date and removed from the gross block and
accumulated depreciation, and booked as loss due to robbery under extraordinary
item. The written down value as on the date of incident was booked as loss
under the profit & loss account.” What about the insurance claim the
company had earlier said it had made? "The company has filled the insurance
claim but as the time period will be long to get the claim, loss was booked to
show the clear picture of financial statements,” the note added.
Auditors Rakesh Singh & Co
in their report said, “Major parts of plant has been reported lost and looted,
thus putting the question on the going concern concept of the company and,
moreover, the company operation was suspended from October 2011.” Conveniently,
the robbers also took away the registers where the company had recorded the
details of its fixed assets. “This (was) maintained at the factory which is
missing after the robbery and could not be presented to us for verification,”
the auditor said.
A Senior market expert was
stated as commenting : “This is the first time I am seeing something like this.
Looks like a total fraud. It raises several questions as to what the auditors
and independent directors are doing”.
Vikash Metal hit the market in 2005 with an
Initial Public Offer of Rs 25 crore. It offered Rs 10 shares at a 100 per cent
premium, at Rs 20 each. Kolkata-based Microsec India was the merchant banker.
According to the offer document cleared by the Securities and Exchange Board of
India, the company raised the money to fund the very plant in Purulia that was
“robbed” seven years later. Two institutions, Bank of New York Mellon (BoNY)and
Ushdev International hold 41.48 per cent and 9.1 per cent, respectively. BoNY
is a custodian and typically holds shares on behalf of other institutions.
Vikash’s troubles peaked around early 2012, when it failed to comply with the
listing agreement requirement of filing quarterly results. In April 2012, the
National Stock Exchange suspended the scrip for “Non-compliance with provisions
of the listing agreement (including) non- submission of financial results for
the quarter ended December 31, 2011.” The scrip continued to trade in the BSE,
hitting newer lows. This week it was trading at far less than a Rupee.
In a rib tickling comedy
vaigai puyal Vadivelu would go to a Police station seeking to lodge a complaint
of theft of a well. Yes the ‘agricultural well’. He would state that he took a
bank loan for digging a well and planned to provide drinking water to the
residents of nearby villages and provide water for irrigation. In his defence,
he would state that for loan, the bank officials had visited, made a report and
then approved loan. On the Govt. side, he would claim that Govt officials had
issued receipt approving the well – all this done by taking bribes and without
physically inspecting the site / property at all - thus he would say he has the
receipt and would go to the Collector or to Court for filing a suit, if the FIR
for missing well was not registered. The stunned Police Inspector would resign
his job and run away in the comedy.
With regards – S. Sampathkumar.
27th July 2013.
Working our glutes, our abs, getting your
ReplyDeleteabs, it's just getting slower. What we're gonna
do today is an Inch Worm. We just go to the bottom and I just do very short rep range.
Lift and down Come on, bigger, wider circles.
Here is my website ... big asses girls free