Straight drive; boast; volley; lob; nick shot;
skid boast; mizuki…. Wonder what – some of the terms associated with Squash.
Squash is a racquet sport played by two (singles) or four players (doubles) in
a four-walled court with a small, hollow rubber ball. The players alternate in
striking the ball with their racquet and hit the ball onto the playable
surfaces of the four walls of the court.
Peril (n) - Serious and immediate danger; the
dangers or difficulties that arise from a particular situation or activity. Some of its synonyms are : jeopardy - danger
- hazard - risk - menace – threat.
In Insurance parlance, peril is what is
covered in a property policy of insurance.
It is a specific risk or cause of loss – covered by the insurance
policy. Some of the perils are : fire,
lightning, impact damage, flood, inundation …. There are named peril policies
and ‘all risks’ policies which do not cover all risks but covers perils other
than those specifically excluded. A
peril is a particular risk that may cause a loss or damage. The type of policy
you purchase will determine which perils you are covered for.
There is another terminology – ‘Act of God’ [AOG]
perils… these are not literally the act of God but often used to describe when a
natural event occurs in which damage is caused. When you hear about an “Act of
God” you generally tend to think of events that cannot be prevented such as
forest fires, earthquakes, tornadoes, landslides, and so forth. Most property
policies carry a different Excess [deductible] for AOG perils as against normal
perils. More on AOG perils in a separate
post, as this is intended to be a post on the Squash champion who has sued a
bank - 10 lakhs as damages.
Reports state that Arjuna awardee and squash
champion Dipika Pallikal, livid by the way the Axis Bank treated her during a
foreign tour, claims that it affected her performance and has sued the bank for
Rs 10 lakh. The Bank reportedly responded by
lobbing the ball back saying she
isn’t tough enough.
Dipika is the first Indian woman to crack the
top 10 in WSA rankings. Ranked number 13 in the world in 2011,Pallikal was
participating in the Cathay Pacific Sun Hung Kai Squash Open in Rotterdam , Holland .
Before her first round match, she had to pay a bill of 490 euros (Rs
30,000) when she checked out of
Brainpark hotel there. It is reported
that despite having a balance of more than Rs 2 lakh in her account, the
transaction failed, with the card-reading device showing link error.
The player of International acclaim is suing
Axis Bank Ltd for the humiliation she felt and the loss of reputation
after that transaction was declined even
though she had enough money in her account. In her consumer complaint, Dipika
said some players from other countries even made snide remarks on her
credit-worthiness as well as about the country. She had contacted her mother in
India
who in turn sent an urgent text message to the bank’s executive, but the
official was unhelpful. She managed to settle the bill with another card that
she was carrying.
While she claims that she was traumatised due
to the incident and was unable to perform in subsequent tournaments; the bank
intriguingly denied the charge of
negligence by citing technical reasons, questioned her suitability to be a
world champion and accused her of being unprofessional.
Dipika further claims that in another
instance, she received Rs.1 lakh as award from the Union Sports Minister. When
she deposited the cheque drawn in her favour, the bank returned it, saying “not
drawn on us”. After yet another exasperating round of communication, the bank
finally admitted that the cheque was returned due to a technical error.
Coupling these two, she filed the consumer complaint before the District
Consumer Redressal Forum, South (Chennai) in 2012 seeking Rs. 10 lakh
compensation.
In its written version, the bank denied
causing mental agony to Dipika. “The very fact that the complainant is not able
to take the slightest disturbance would prove that she lacks the requisite mental
toughness of a world champion… she is only making excuses for her
non-performance and it is unfortunate and unethical to allege criminal acts on
the bank for technical failure that took place in a foreign soil on which the
bank has no control.”
According to the press the matter is being
heard by the District Consumer Redressal Forum.
As for her debit card at Rotterdam , the bank state the failure of the
transaction was ‘act of God’ – over which the bank had no control. How and what
was the nature of that failure and why it is attributed to an act of God may
perhaps be known once the decision is pronounced and more details of the
conduct of the case are made available.
As Insurers we are keen to read and
understand that ‘Act of God’ angle…..
With regards – S. Sampathkumar
3rd Sept. 2013.
whoah this weblog is wonderful i love studying your articles.
ReplyDeleteStay up the great work! You recognize, many individuals
are searching around for this info, you could aid them greatly.
Here is my weblog ... Forex Robot