How backward is Australian climate politics? Here, the absurd racist rubbish – wrote one on
twitter ….. it is about a cartoon published in Murdoch's national newspaper - The Australian which is in its 50th year since its launch in 1964.
Let us laugh this away ~ they know
nothing about India or the outside World !
Almost 200
countries signed historic pledge to hold global temperatures to a maximum rise
of 1.5C above pre-industrial levels – a historic, legally binding climate deal that
aims to hold global temperatures to a maximum rise of 1.5C above pre-industrial
levels, staving off the worst effects of catastrophic global warming, has been
secured. The culmination of more than 20 years of fraught UN climate talks has
seen all countries agree to reduce emissions, promise to raise $100bn a year by
2020 to help poor countries adapt their economies, and accept a new goal of
zero net emissions by later this century. Formally adopted in Paris by 195
countries, the first universal climate deal will see an accelerated phase-out
of fossil fuels, the growth of renewable energy streams and powerful new carbon
markets to enable countries to trade emissions and protect forests.
As the final text
of the agreement was released, the French president, François Hollande, said:
“This is a major leap for mankind. The agreement will not be perfect for
everyone, if everyone reads it with only their own interests in mind. We will
not be judged on a clause in a sentence, but on the text as a whole. We will
not be judged on a word, but on an act.”
…… down under – the Australian cheaply published a cartoon depicting
starving Indians chopping up and eating solar panels sent to the developing
nation in an attempt to curb carbon emissions has been condemned as
“unequivocally racist”. Drawn by the veteran cartoonist Bill Leak, Monday’s
cartoon was his response to the climate deal signed in Paris at the weekend.
Amanda Wise, an
associate professor of sociology at Macquarie University, said in her view the
cartoon was shocking and would be unacceptable in the UK, the US or Canada. “This
cartoon is unequivocally racist and draws on very base stereotypes of third
world, underdeveloped people who don’t know what to do with technology,” Wise
told Guardian Australia. “India is the technology centre of the world right now
and has some of the most high-tech industries on the planet in that part of the
world. The underlying message is that people in developing countries don’t need
all these technologies to do with climate change – they need food.
“But actually it is
people living in poverty that will suffer the most through food security, sea
level rises, dropping of the water table.” Wise said: “I
don’t know too many places in the world where you would get away with that to
be honest. In the UK and the US there would be an incredible outcry. It is
appalling.
“This is really old imagery he has drawn on. Thin, starving people
wearing turbans, who are so starving they are going to chop up solar panels.
That is 1950s symbolism. We have moved on. The rest of the world has
moved on. “In Australia people from India are the second largest migrant group
and they are coming here on skilled visas.” The Australian’s cartoon has
provoked anger in India. “This only demonstrates the … provincial ignorance of
both the journalist, cartoonist and publication,” said Shoma Chaudhury, editor
of Catch News and a well-known local journalist.
“India has not only
been a sophisticated negotiator on climate change, insisting ‘developed’
nations pay their dues for destroying the planet, it has also voluntarily
started adopting renewables like solar energy in hundreds of villages. It has
not needed to be browbeaten into climate intelligence or consciousness, unlike
many developed nations. “In truth, the bewildered farmers in Leak’s cartoon
could probably teach him a thing or two about solar panels, while treating him
to the indisputable pleasures of mango chutney.” [largely reproduced from The
Guardian UK]
What Leak might not
have read is the news in Huffington Post that a town council in North Carolina rejected plans
to rezone land for a solar farm after residents voiced fears it would cause
cancer, stop plants from growing and suck up all the energy from the sun. Two
citizens reportedly made the allegations at a Woodland Town Council meeting in
Northampton County, northeastern North Carolina.
Bobby Mann said the
farm would "suck up all the energy from the sun and businesses would not
come to Woodland," the Roanoke-Chowan Herald-News reports. Retired science
teacher Jane Mann feared the proposed solar ranch could hinder photosynthesis
-- the process of converting light energy from the sun into chemical energy for
fuel -- in the area and stop plants from growing. She added that no one could tell her solar
panels didn't cause cancer. Other residents feared the effect it would have on
the price of their homes.
Councilors were
voting on whether to redefine agriculturally designated land off U.S. Highway
258 for manufacturing. Strata Solar Company representative Brent Niemann told
the meeting the only sunlight used would be that which fell on the panels directly.
"The panels don't draw additional sunlight," he said. Woodland Town
Council turned down the proposal, effectively stopping the company from
building the planned renewable energy ranch. The council later voted to put a
moratorium on future solar farms in the area, the Herald-News reports.
With regards – S.
Sampathkumar
15th Dec
2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment