Mohammad Afzal Guru was a terrorist convicted for his role in the
December 2001 terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament. He received the death
sentence for his involvement, which was upheld by the Indian Supreme Court. It is stated that he received terrorist training in Pakistan and
was found to have played a central role in the Parliament attacks having provided
hideout and logistics for the terrorists in New Delhi. Tracking of phone calls
between him and the militants, minutes before the attack, proved his role,
which he later confessed to. In 2001, Guru was arrested, along with three
others. The initial conviction and sentence was made by a special Prevention of
Terrorism Act Court in 2002, which was confirmed in 2003 by the Delhi High
Court. In 2005, his appeal was rejected by the Supreme Court of India. In Feb 2013, his mercy petition was rejected
by the President of India, Pranab Mukherjee and he was hanged at Delhi's Tihar
Jail on 9 February 2013.
Sad to read that a seasoned
politician P C Chidambaram now wakes up
to the possibility that Afzal Guru may not have been that involved in the
attack on Parliament. It took 15 years and a bunch of students creating a
ruckus for him to have this epiphany and wake up to a whole new ball of wool
! To be absolutely fair, it is the BJP
who inherited this issue and had nothing to do with it except being in power
when the assault took place and 14 people were killed including 5 terrorists
intent on committing mayhem. The UPA government had over a decade to exercise
whatever options it wanted to, including setting the self-confessed man free.
It did not take any action. In 2013, the Congress cabal was keen to show its
credentials to its vote banks and counter the speeding Modi bandwagon. Now suddenly Mr P Chidambaram has got a public
change of heart and is indicting his own party too on a man against whom
evidence of involvement was way beyond reasonable doubt. He was charged under
section 121 of waging war against the state. The Vice President’s car was
targeted. The death toll of innocents was 9 people: would Mr PC ever ask their
families how they feel.
Afzal Guru was unrelenting
and stated that the 13 December attack was linked to the Kashmir issue. The Supreme Court rejected his final appeal
against the death sentence. The President of India rejected his mercy petition.
It was an attack on the symbol of the country. It led to a troop movement of
100,000 soldiers to the border in preparation of a possible war. Afzal took
sleuths to his hiding places from where explosives were discovered.
Is it blatantly challenging
the Apex Court too for the decision ? expectedly
Congress on Thursday distanced itself from its senior leader P Chidambaram’s
remark that the case of Parliament attack convict Afzal Guru, who was hanged in
2013, “was perhaps not correctly decided”. “The decision of the honourable
Supreme Court in the Afzal Guru case is final and declaratory of law and
justice in the case. It is futile to reopen this debate since the matter has
attained judicial finality. Every citizen and instrumentality of the government
is bound in law to accept the judgment of the final court,” party spokesman
Ashwani Kumar told reporters. Chidambaram
was Union Home minister when Afzal Guru’s mercy plea was rejected by the
previous UPA government in 2011.
With regards – S.
Sampathkumar
26th Feb 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment