Developer activates
the light sensitive crystals that make up the emulsion on your paper. When the
crystals come into contact with developer, any parts of the paper exposed to
light will become some shade of black. Then
there is Stop Bath, an acid that
deactivates the developer. Fixer removes
the unexposed crystals on the emulsion, making the paper light safe. Paper that
has been through fixer can then be taken into open light without worries of
turning black. Insufficient fixing will turn a picture yellow over time.
Wonder what
this is all about ? - the complex
process that the film roll underwent as it turned the negative to a print that
you liked ! ~ and we have been fed so
much with this idiom - "A picture is worth a thousand words" - referring to the notion that a complex idea can be
conveyed with just a single still image or that an image of a subject conveys
its meaning or essence more effectively than a description does.
This phrase emerged in the
USA in the early part of the 20th century. Its introduction is
widely attributed to Frederick R. Barnard, who published a piece commending the
effectiveness of graphics in advertising with the title "One look is worth
a thousand words", in Printer's Ink, December 1921. Barnard claimed the
phrase's source to be oriental by adding "so said a famous Japanese
philosopher.
The history of the camera
can be traced much further back than the introduction of photography. Cameras
evolved from the camera obscura, and continued to change through many
generations of photographic technology, including daguerreotypes, calotypes,
dry plates, film, and to the modern day with digital cameras. Life has changed
much as we moved away from Eastman, Kodak, Sekura, Konica and more of film
rolls – the birth of digital camera changed the life, the skillset required in
photography. Digital cameras differ from their analog predecessors primarily in
that they do not use film, but capture and save photographs on digital memory
cards or internal storage instead. Their low operating costs have relegated
chemical cameras to niche markets.
This is no post
on photography or cameras but on pictures, more so on the research of Durham
University on studied the impact of photos on menus !! often in high end restaurants we are stumped
to relate what the dish could be by reading its name on the menu ?
The findings of the
research in this interesting article on Daily Mail states that pictures will put off diners if accompanying a
complicate dish name; and if menu item is simple then images will make a diner
more likely to order it !!!
There are
many distinctions to be made between high end restaurant and cheaper eateries
but one of the easiest ways to tell the difference is to see if there are
pictures on the menu or not. Posh establishments tend not to embellish their
menus with images of the fancy food on offer, while high street chains and
cheap cafes will tend to advertise their wares visually.
It turns out
there's a very good reason for this, researchers from Durham University have
discovered - and it's because images will put us off unless promoting a very
simple dish. The study by Durham University Business School found that if the
name of a menu item is straightforward, such as 'burger and chips,' a picture
next to it will make a diner more likely to buy the dish.
Most high
end restaurant menus don't include pictures, and that's because the complicated
and often obscure descriptions would put off diners if accompanied by photos, the
study has found. But if a meal has an ambiguous or complicated name, such as
'Midnight Madness Cake' to describe a simple chocolate cake, pictures can have
the opposite effect and put diners off the meal, the study found. Having a
picture next to a menu item that doesn't reveal much about the dish could make
the diner feel disappointed if the description doesn't live up to what the meal
actually looks like, the findings revealed.
It goes some
way to explain why top restaurants, which often feature dishes with vague
descriptions or obscure ingredients, hardly ever have pictures on the menu. The
findings also confirm why many high street chains, diners and cafes have
pictures on the menu as their dishes tend to be simpler and more familiar to a
larger audience.
It's not
very common to find images on restaurant menus anymore - and marketing
professor Dr Yusani Hou explained that it's because it can be a risk as it can
put off diners. The study of 671 people, conducted by assistant professor in
marketing at Durham University Business School, Dr Yuansi Hou, explored how
restaurant menus can provoke very different reactions from customers. She also
found that the use of descriptive words, such as a 'tender' chicken salad, is a
growing trend restaurants use to boost sales. But as Dr Hou's research
uncovered, accompanying such a dish with an image is a risk as the customer
will judge if the dish is really 'tender' based on that picture.
Dr Hou
explained how restaurants can use images on menus effectively. She said: 'Our
research revealed that if a restaurant wants to make use of imagery and visual
prompts on their menu, this needs to be combined with commonly used and
"accurate" food names to increase marketing power. 'While it may seem a basic approach, photos
can act as a positive reinforcement for customers who have made a visual
connection that reflects the name of that dish. 'However, pairing extravagant
food names with pictures that are too far from reality have the opposite effect
and will be a turn off for customers.
'So, while
you may think you know what you want to choose, the next time you ponder over a
restaurant menu, there is likely to be a very calculated internal response
before you give your order to the waiter.' ~ and the next
time you go to a hotel after reading this post, you are more likely to check
whether the menu card has photos of the dishes !!
With regards
– S. Sampathkumar.
17th
June 2017
Pic of real
foodie in a famous restaurant – not on the menu card.
No comments:
Post a Comment