We
go to temples ~ there is a popular notion in Tamil Nadu that brahminical caste
controls temple …. . .. .. one needs to
understand that there are Priests and rituals, there are various functions
including preparation of food for the Lord and purappadu (procession) of idols
.. .. .. the administration of the Temple (managing the funds received and
administering the various functional activities) lies with the Govt. – done
through Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) – that way you
have the State Govt celebrating the birth of ex-CM in Temples, though this
activity would have absolutely no connection with the Temple, Lord, its
devotees and more so, in respect of the donations offered in Hundis and other
ways – as these are specific towards the temple and not for anything else.
Worshipping
the Supreme God in idol form – the ‘Archavatharam’ is considered most sacred
for Hindus and there are thousands of puranic temples in Tamilnadu. Temples are not merely places of worship,
they have protected the literature, developed moral rectitude, awakened
spirituality, functioned as places of music, art, sculpture, architecture,
culture, and many a times as storage of food grains, a la granary. Kings and Emperors who ruled this part of the
land, glorified themselves by constructing
big temples and serving the God in many ways. The Kings, patrons and later day rich barons,
donated vast tracts of land and property to the Temple to ensure that they
flourish, thereby the devotees also flourish.
They arranged for ‘annadanam’ – free distribution of food to devotees.
Around
100 years ago, there was the system of Trustees, comprising primarily of those
locals with good education, religious fervour and moral correctness – there
were some instances where men at the helm indulged in some wrongful acts, - the
need for a strong corrective measures was felt.
Then came the Govt. control. Now,
in Tamilnadu, the temples are
administered by Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Administration
Department [HR&CE]. Primarily, they are not owners but managers of the properties
of the Temples and theoretically should be taking care of the property without
altering or interfering with the religious affairs, agamas and holy
practices. By their own admission
HR&CE considers the maintenance of temples as its first and
foremost duty keeping the greatness of temples in mind and carries out its
functions accordingly.
There
is no similar set-up organization nor Govt control over the places of worship
of any other religion - Hindu Religious
and Charitable Endowments Administration Department supervises the
administration of Hindu and Jain Religious Institutions and
Hindu Charitable Endowments in
Tamilnadu. It has 36356 temples; 56
Mutts and 17 Jain temples under its control.
The Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951, came
into force from 28th August 1951. There
have been amendments to the Act from time to time.Recently
a newsitem in Dinamalar stated when a list was so drawn, it was observed that
many temples have gone missing !!
Of
the many functions and responsibilities of the HR&CE Dept is the fixation
of fair rent for the sites and buildings belonging to the religious
institutions. It is stated that these
are to be revised periodically, atleast once in three years by a committee
constituted by the Commissioner. The
fair rent is fixed in accordance with the market value of the land and cost of
the building worked out as per Government Order. There is another, more important
responsibility, that of ‘Temple Renovation’ which mostly occur with the support
of many philanthropists and religiously minded people.
Now read this sad story of ‘missing idols’ (not due to the theft
!) and missing ornaments – where the custodians are being accused : HC orders
probe into missing idols at Srirangam temple
~ Times of India Chennai edition
of date 7th Dec 2018.
The Madras high court has directed the idol wing CID to conduct
a preliminary probe into the alleged theft of 42 ancient temple idols and
artefacts from Srirangam Temple during its renovation, and file a report to the
court in a week.
A special bench of Justice R Mahadevan and Justice P D
Audikesavalu issued the interim direction on the pleas moved by Rangarajan
Narasimhan and advocate Elephant G Rajendran seeking direction to the wing to
register an FIR based on their complaints on the missing idols. When the plea
came up for hearing, Rajendran submitted that 52 antique doors of the temple
and many ancient stones and other artefacts were removed/replaced from the
temple during its renovation. “There are two types of thieves who steal temple
properties. One steals idols and the other steals temple jewellery. The latter
is mostly officials of Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments department,”
Rajendran said.
In one particular case, an official of the department stole a
jewellery from a temple and tried to sell it off in Bangalore. Fortunately, the
jeweller whom the official approached was the one who donated the jewel to the
temple. Later, based on a complaint from the jeweller the official was
arrested,” he added.
To this, counsel representing the department submitted that
since a similar complaint was already filed by Narasimhan and the wing had
already commenced the probe there could not be yet another FIR for the same
issue.Recording the submissions, the bench tagged the pleas and directed the
wing to conduct a preliminary probe to ascertain whether prima facie case was
made out and file a report to the court within one week.
Similarly, in the plea alleging theft of an antique peacock idol
from Kapaleeshwarar Temple, Mylapore, the department informed the court that a
high-level team comprising joint commissioners of Rameshwaram and Madurai had
been constituted to probe the allegation. The department also sought the court
to direct the idol wing to not to interfere in its actions.
Recording the same, the bench said the department could proceed
further with the inquiry. The court, however, made it clear that the idol wing
could also proceed with its probe notwithstanding the inquiry being conducted
by the department.
With regards – S. Sampathkumar
7th Dec 2o18.
No comments:
Post a Comment