Robots are quite interesting ! (this post is more on bots!) ~ in
Rajini starrer Enthiran (Robot) – Chitti, the humanoid robot would read a full
book by just scanning it in his face for a couple of seconds. That perhaps was a thought that Sujatha wrote
in ‘Mr Munsamy oru 1.2.1’ – in which a roadside rickshaw puller acquires super memory by
an injection that were to lost only for a short period !! I felt ‘Enthiran –
the robot’ was a poor cousin of his classic ‘En Iniya Iyanthira and Meendum
Jeano’ - the little Jeeno, the cute robotic dog in
the story woven subtly around a dictator
who keeps the Nation under tight grip.
The real identity of the Head when known at the end was the real classical revelation. The pet robot dog which can think beyond
humans, assists the dumb Nila in search of her spouse Sibi into bigger
things. Towards the end, the cute
exceptionally dog loses it memory and back up and fades away !I felt very sad
reading of its end - illogical it might sound, it was after all a
story – yet !!
Downunder,
a bot, Christened Mia, or My Interactive Agent, the AI-backed virtual assistant
made waves that it can respond to 300 of
the most common customer inquiries made during the home loan application
process. As you
make online transactions on web, a drop down figurine might introduce
him/herself and ask whether any
assistance is required .. … in all probability it is no human interface !
A
chatbot is a piece of software that conducts a conversation via auditory or
textual methods. Such programs are often
designed to convincingly simulate how a human would behave as a conversational
partner, although as of 2019, they are far short of being able to pass the
Turing test. Chatbots are typically used
in dialog systems for various practical purposes including customer service or
information acquisition. Some chatbots use sophisticated natural language
processing systems, but many simpler ones scan for keywords within the input,
then pull a reply with the most matching keywords, or the most similar wording
pattern, from a database. The term
"ChatterBot" was originally coined by Michael Mauldin (creator of the
first Verbot, Julia) in 1994 to describe these conversational programs. Today,
most chatbots are accessed via virtual assistants such as Google Assistant and
Amazon Alexa, via messaging apps such as Facebook Messenger or WeChat, or via
individual organizations' apps and websites.
Beyond
chatbots, there are Conversational AI
used in messaging apps, speech-based assistants and chatbots to automate
communication and create personalized customer experiences at scale. Vodafone,
like any other storied telco giant today, has been urgently seeking ways to
trim costs. Not only are its revenues under pressure from smaller upstarts, it
must also spend heavily on upgrading its network infrastructure to handle
faster, 5G data speeds.
One
cost-cutting idea that Vodafone has chased is to automate certain internal
tasks carried out by staff with simple bots and, in some cases, more
sophisticated chatbots. The painful result is fewer people on payroll. Vodafone
has, for instance, deployed so-called “robotic process automation” bots to
automate back-office tasks like data entry. As a result, Vodafone said that in
the first half of 2018 it laid off 900 people. .. .. for sure, Vodafone is not
alone ! ~ we have heard this in Insurance circles too .. that some backend
processing is planned to happen using bots.
Here
is an interesting piece read in Forbes .. .. “ Meet Amy. And also Debbie, Inga,
Mia, Erica, Eva and Cora”. These aren’t the members of a new, all-female rock
group, but names that several large banks have been giving to their automated
digital assistants. So-called chatbots have become a useful cost-cutting tools
for companies with large subscriber bases (think banks, insurance firms and
mobile phone operators). As they replace human call-center workers, such bots
will help save banks an estimated $7.3 billion in operational costs by 2023, Juniper
Research predicts. But the proliferation of bots with female names raises
questions about whether they might also perpetuate gender stereotypes,
particularly around the notion of women in the role of assistants. That
criticism has already been levelled at Amazon’s digital assistant Alexa and
Apple’s Siri.
A
Forbes analysis of Europe’s 10 biggest banks ranked by assets shows that at
least three have deployed chatbots with female names on their websites and
apps. One chatbot Marie, available to
retail customers on Facebook Messenger, was given the name "because it
conjures up an image of someone who is helpful and friendly," Female
chatbots abound in other regions and industries. Mia, the chatbot released by
Australian digital bank UBank, was described by the company earlier this month
as “empathetic,” “fun” and “a little bit cheeky.”
IPSoft,
a New York-based software company that sells chatbot technology to banks like
Sweden’s SEB as well as mobile network giant Vodafone, has its own white-label
version of a customer-facing chatbot, named Amelia. IPSoft’s CEO Chetan Dube
denied that the chatbot’s name perpetuated stereotypes, when asked by Forbes
during an interview in December, and said it instead highlights “the thought
leadership that is represented in females." "She was the first female aviator that
tried to go around the world,” Dube added, referring to the 1930's aviator
Amelia Earhart. Forbes
revealed earlier this month that Vodafone was measuring the success of its
chatbots on how many staff could be replaced by the software. While that may be
an uncomfortable metric, the more worrying consequence of chatbots, according
to four industry experts questioned by Forbes, is the risk that they could
reinforce certain stereotypes.
“Gender
bias is an increasingly serious issue in chatbot design, especially for
voice-based chatbots,” says John Taylor, CEO of action.ai, a British startup
that makes chatbot software for banks and travel companies. “These assistants
often perform tasks that many view as menial.”
Vitor Shereiber, a language
specialist at the German language-learning app Babbel, says that focus-group
testing might lead companies to assign a gender to a chatbot on the notion that
it makes customer feel more comfortable. But, he adds, bots could spread
unrealistic expectations of how women should present themselves professionally,
just as photoshopped pictures have done for women’s perceptions of their bodies.
Part of the challenge for companies is finding a balance between automating
customer service without putting customers off. PwC recently described chatbots
as being able to “massively enhance customer delight and loyalty” because of
their “personal touch.”
Interesting
!
With
regards – S. Sampathkumar
3rd
Dec 2019.
No comments:
Post a Comment