In life
you would have observed some street fighters ! ~ they would tend to fight and
harm dangerously without any provocation !
In Western countries, you would have read of ‘random killing’ – a gunshop
without any rhyme or reason, without apparent motive – more dangerous than
hardcore killers !
Lieutenant Colonel Sir
Vincent Arthur Henry McMahon was a British Indian Army officer and diplomat
who served as the High Commissioner in Egypt from 1915 to 1917. He was also an administrator in the British Raj
and served twice as Chief Commissioner of Balochistan. McMahon is best known for
the McMahon Line between Tibet and India, and the Declaration to the Seven in
response to a memorandum written by seven notable Syrians.
In civilized
World too, there are ‘Rogue states’ – the ones that are to be outlawed for
threatening global peace. In WW II, the scale of China’s involvement was
massive. Chiang, for example, fielded four million troops, while China as a
whole lost an estimated 14 million in the war. Had China folded, Japan’s
capacity to fight the U.S. or even the Soviets would have been vastly
amplified. On the Chinese side, after
1949 when the civil war was over, the Nationalists had been exiled to Taiwan,
and Mao was victorious on the mainland, it rewrote a virgin history in the mainland of
China—that the only people who had made a contribution to fighting and
defeating the Japanese.
Recently in a sad day for
the Nation, Twenty Indian soldiers were killed in a "violent
face-off" with Chinese troops at Galwan Valley in Ladakh. At that time
there were so many articles on the ambush across the land borders and of
earlier hostilities, and more specifically to the 1962
Sino-Indian War which India lost badly because of the administration lapses and
lack of strong will by the Govt.
The McMahon
Line is the demarcation line between Tibet and the North-east region of India
proposed by British colonial administrator Sir Henry McMahon at the 1914 Simla
Convention signed between British and Tibetan representatives. It is currently the generally recognized
boundary between China and India, although its legal status is disputed by the
Chinese government. The Line of Actual
Control (LAC) is a loose demarcation line that separates Indian-controlled
territory from Chinese-controlled territory in the Sino-Indian border dispute.
The term was first used by Zhou Enlai in a 1959 letter to Jawaharlal Nehru.
To those who
advocated that the skirmishes were on border dispute – here is something to
read. Australia, as we know is thousands of miles away from China. The air
travel (bird fly) shortest distance between Australia and China is 7,448 km=
4,628 miles. If one were to travel in an airplane that has average
speed of 560 miles per hour, it would take 8.26 hours to reach one country from other.
Israel, one of India’s top
defence suppliers, assured all possible help to the country amid the Ladakh
border crisis in a defence minister level conversation on Friday, adding to the
list of allies who have pledged support as military tensions continue with
China. People aware of the matter said the border situation with China was
discussed during a telephonic exchange between defence minister Rajnath Singh
and his counterpart Lt Gen Benjamin Gantz in which they also discussed
“possibilities of further strengthening the defence engagements”. Besides, the
Indonesian defence minister, Prabowo Subianto, is expected to visit New Delhi
on Monday for discussions on regional issues and expanding defence ties with
new joint naval exercises. India and Indonesia have been working together in
the maritime domain, including joint patrolling activities along the Malacca
straits under the CORPAT series.
The Spratly
Islands dispute is an ongoing territorial dispute between China, Taiwan,
Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam, and Brunei, concerning
"ownership" of a group of
small islands and associated
"maritime features" (reefs, banks, cays, etc.) located in the South
China Sea. The dispute is characterised by diplomatic stalemate and the
employment of military pressure techniques (such as military occupation of
disputed territory) in the advancement of national territorial claims. All
except Brunei occupy some of the maritime features.
In the 19th
century, Europeans found that Chinese fishermen from Hainan annually sojourned
on the Spratly islands for part of the year, while in 1877 it was the British
who launched the first modern legal claims to the Spratlys. When the Spratlys and Paracels were being
surveyed by Germany in 1883, China issued protests against them. China sent
naval forces on inspection tours in 1902 and 1907 and placed flags and markers
on the islands. The Qing dynasty's successor state, the Republic of China,
claimed the Spratly and Paracel islands under the jurisdiction of Hainan. The
Spratlys and the Paracels were conquered by Japan in 1939. Japan administered
the Spratlys via Taiwan's jurisdiction and the Paracels via Hainan's
jurisdiction. In 1947, the Republic of China drew up the map
showing the U shaped claim on the entire South China Sea, showing the Spratly
and Paracels in Chinese territory. In
1947, the ROC government renamed 159 islands in the area and published the Map
of the South China Sea Islands.
There has been a sharp
rise in media coverage owing mainly to China's increasingly vocal objection to
the presence of American naval vessels transiting the area in order to assert
the right to freedom of navigation within international waters. Most of the
"maritime features" in this area have at least six names: The
"International name", usually in English; the "Chinese
name", sometimes different for PRC and ROC (and also in different
character-sets); the Vietnamese, Philippine and Malaysian names, and also,
there are alternate names (e.g. Spratly Island is also known as Storm Island),
and sometimes names with European origins (French, Portuguese, Spanish, British,
etc.).
The ongoing
dispute with Beijing may worsen as Australia made a declaration at the UN that
several disputed islands are not Chinese territory. Australia filed a declaration at the United
Nations in New York on Friday night and rejected claims made by China to parts
of the South China Sea. The declaration said China's claims to the Spratly
Islands and the Parcel Islands were 'invalid' as they were inconsistent with
the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
This move will likely
anger Beijing as the relationship between the two countries continues to
deteriorate, with China bringing in crippling trade sanctions and threatening
consumer boycotts. The declaration said Australia does not accept the assertion
made by Beijing, who believes it claim to islands and parts of the South China
Sea are recognised by the international community.Tensions between the nations
have escalated since Prime Minister Scott Morrison called for an inquiry into
the origins of the coronvirus pandemic. Since then, China has brought in harsh
trade tariffs which hit Australian farmers, including an 80 per cent tariff on
barley.
'The Australian Government
rejects any claims by China that are inconsistent with the 1982 United Nations
Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), in particular, maritime claims that
do not adhere to its rules on baselines, maritime zones and classification of
features,' the declaration said. 'There is no legal basis for China to draw
straight baselines connecting the outermost points of maritime features or
''island groups'' in the South China Sea, including around the ''Four Sha'' or
''continental'' or ''outlying'' archipelagos. Australia said China cannot change
the classification of a feature in the South China Sea under UNCLOS.
The move comes days before
talks between Australia and the US at the annual AUSMIN talks, where it is
expected China will be a focal point of discussion. Foreign Minister Marise
Payne and Defence Minister Linda Reynolds are flying to Washington DC on Sunday
and will meet with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Defence Secretary Mark
Esper. 'Never has it been more important that we, as allies, sit down together and
find every possible way to advance our shared interests,' Senator Payne and
Senator Reynolds wrote in The Weekend Australian on Saturday.
Tensions in
the South China Sea heightened last week when Chinese Navy and Australian
warships were engaged in a stand-off. The Australian vessels were sailing close
to the Spratly Islands - which are claimed by Beijing as well as the
Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam - when the incident happened, the ABC reported.
Australian warships - including HMAS Canberra, HMAS Hobart, HMAS Stuart, HMAS
Arunta and HMAS Sirius - are on exercise in the region ahead of military war
games off Hawaii with the US and Japan. 'Australia is committed to a secure,
open, prosperous and resilient Indo-Pacific region. We routinely work with
regional partners to address shared security challenges,' a Defence spokesman
said.
Interesting !
With regards – S.
Sampathkumar
25.7.2020.
No comments:
Post a Comment